Boundary Managementsm

 ¾ An Extensive Policy Governance® Resource for Boards of Directors 

¾ Proven Expertise in Basic to Advanced Governance Design

¾ The Authoritative Source for Boundary Management 

 

Owner-Accountable
Corporate Board Rating Project

Overview

The focus of this project is to develop a measurement scale that assesses the connection that a corporate board has with its owners/stockholders.  The strength of that connection will relate to the owner's ability to speak to organizational performance in terms of Ends and Organizational Limitations.  Organizational limitations are different than executive limitations, they are the constraints that owners put on the board and organization.  The ultimate purpose is to provide stockholders with an index of the strength of their voice as owners.  It is to be a measure of an owner-accountable board.

Progress

August 23, 2003:  A request for input about this project to members of IPGA was made on August 13, 2003, and at this point, three members have responded.  Their helpful suggestions ranged from creating an workgroup at the upcoming IPGA Regional Conference in Chicago to additional resources and things to consider. 

Two financial consultants have agreed to help with the initial steps and to provide brainstorming as the project moves ahead.  They have identified a number of stock classification models that might have implications for the project.  Those models are being reviewed for strategies, approaches and technical components that might have an application to this project.

The initial stocks selected to be audited as pilots for owner-accountable activity fall into two groups.  The first group are the top twenty-five most highly traded stocks listed on the Dow over the past six months.  The second group are those that are mentioned or recognized as being owner-responsive.  These are arbitrary choices and have been selected to get a feel for the data and behavior of boards. 

About half of the first group, the highly traded stocks, have been sent a request for information.  At this point, we are waiting for a response.  It may be necessary to become a stockholder to get the information that we desire, and if so, that will be pursued.

A second piece of this project is to provide a resource for those that would like to seek out other information on Owner-Accountability in Corporate Governance.  A list has been started on the Corporate Owner-Accountability Resource page.  It will contain websites, publications, stock indexes, stock activists, and other helpful information.

September 25, 2003:  The following four major criteria have been identified as central activities that a board would exhibit if it were owner-accountable.  Currently, a behavior based scale is being developed for each of these criteria.  These scales will then be applied to a set of publicly traded stocks, consisting of the 25 most widely held stocks and the 25 most widely traded stocks.

  • Owner Identification and Linkage Process
  • Owner Feedback Loop
  • Ends Development and Monitoring
  • Limitation Development and Monitoring

This rating system is about owner-accountability rather than Policy Governance.  There is more to Policy Governance than connecting with the moral owners.  Even at the Limitation level, this system is more interested in the owner's definition of unacceptable performance. 

It has also been recognized that the score of this rating system will not promise nor seek to identify stocks that provide higher returns.  The rating will be neutral to higher returns.  Its purpose is judge how well the organization delivers the owner's expectations, of which return may only be one component.  It should identify stocks that owners have a voice that makes a difference.

An initial survey of publicly traded stocks, suggests that few of them will rank highly within the ratings.

October 6, 2003:  The core set of publicly traded stocks have been identified.  They can be found on the Corporate Board Rating page.  These corporations are now being contacted to assess the availability of information that will determine their owner-accountability.

January 14, 2004:  Few corporate boards responded to our inquiries and little evidence was given in their annual reports or other documentation about their approach to owner-accountability.  In response to the lack of available information, an additional direction is being pursued. Other stock rating scales may assess the connection to owners.  We are now reviewing the range of scales and their interest in owner-accountability.